| SEA | POS | Min | WP48 | PoP48 | WP | PTS | DRB | ORB | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-13 PHI | SF | 2892 | .033 | -2.1 | 2.0 | 18.2 | 7.7 | 0.9 | 8.6 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 3.3 |
| 11-12 PHI | SG | 1713 | .111 | 0.4 | 4.0 | 17.1 | 9.8 | 0.8 | 10.5 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 3.3 |
| 10-11 PHI | SG | 1800 | .094 | -0.1 | 3.5 | 15.1 | 7.0 | 1.1 | 8.2 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| Career Avg | SF | 2135 | .071 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 0.9 | 9.0 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.4 |
| Average SF | SF | 1737 | .099 | 0.0 | 3.6 | 20.3 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 7.6 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 3.8 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | PPS | FTA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turner 12-13 | 41.9% | 42.8% | 36.5% | 74.0% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 17.5 | 2.6 | 1.04 | 3.5 |
| Turner 11-12 | 44.6% | 46.6% | 22.4% | 67.6% | 45.5% | 47.8% | 16.5 | 1.4 | 1.03 | 3.0 |
| Turner 10-11 | 42.5% | 43.5% | 31.8% | 80.8% | 43.9% | 48.4% | 14.1 | 1.2 | 1.07 | 3.3 |
| Turner (career) | 42.8% | 44.1% | 32.9% | 74.4% | 44.7% | 47.9% | 16.3 | 1.9 | 1.04 | 3.3 |
| Average SF | 44.7% | 47.7% | 36.1% | 78.1% | 49.4% | 54.0% | 16.6 | 4.3 | 1.22 | 5.0 |
| Team | GP | MIN | WP | PTS | REB | AST | BLK | STL | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-13 PHI | 82 | 2892 | 2.0 | 1094 | 517 | 354 | 17 | 71 | 187 | 197 |
| 11-12 PHI | 65 | 1713 | 4.0 | 610 | 376 | 180 | 20 | 40 | 105 | 117 |
| 10-11 PHI | 78 | 1800 | 3.5 | 565 | 306 | 159 | 14 | 49 | 80 | 138 |
| Career | 225 | 2135 | 3.2 | 2269 | 1199 | 693 | 51 | 160 | 372 | 452 |
So while reading the Truehoop First Cup today I came across the curious bullet point about some guy in Philadelphia, who on some talk show tried to offer some half-hearted half-assed explanation for what's wrong with Evan Turner. And as I read the quoted part of the article, I just grew more confused:
