| SEA | POS | Min | WP48 | PoP48 | WP | PTS | DRB | ORB | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-13 LAL | PG | 1627 | .144 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 18.8 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 9.8 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.1 |
| 11-12 PHO | PG | 1961 | .260 | 5.0 | 10.6 | 18.9 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 4.6 | 16.3 | 5.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 |
| 10-11 PHO | PG | 2497 | .244 | 4.5 | 12.7 | 21.3 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 5.0 | 16.4 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
| 09-10 PHO | PG | 2660 | .250 | 4.7 | 13.8 | 24.1 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 4.8 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.9 |
| 08-09 PHO | PG | 2484 | .194 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 22.4 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 13.9 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| 07-08 PHO | PG | 2780 | .251 | 4.7 | 14.6 | 23.7 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 15.5 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| 06-07 PHO | PG | 2682 | .307 | 6.5 | 17.1 | 25.3 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 4.8 | 15.8 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
| 05-06 PHO | PG | 2796 | .293 | 6.0 | 17.1 | 25.6 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 5.7 | 14.2 | 4.7 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
| 04-05 PHO | PG | 2573 | .283 | 5.7 | 15.2 | 21.7 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 16.1 | 4.6 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 2.5 |
| 03-04 DAL | PG | 2612 | .215 | 3.6 | 11.7 | 20.7 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 12.6 | 3.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 02-03 DAL | PG | 2711 | .217 | 3.7 | 12.3 | 25.8 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 10.6 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 2.4 |
| 01-02 DAL | PG | 2838 | .191 | 2.9 | 11.3 | 24.8 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 4.3 | 10.7 | 3.9 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.8 |
| 00-01 DAL | PG | 2387 | .204 | 3.3 | 10.2 | 22.0 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 4.5 | 10.2 | 4.1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| Career Avg | PG | 2508 | .238 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 22.9 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 13.8 | 4.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Average PG | PG | 1692 | .099 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 19.0 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | PPS | FTA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nash 12-13 | 49.7% | 51.9% | 43.8% | 92.2% | 55.7% | 60.5% | 14.0 | 3.8 | 1.34 | 3.4 |
| Nash 11-12 | 53.2% | 58.0% | 39.0% | 89.4% | 58.1% | 62.5% | 13.6 | 3.5 | 1.39 | 3.5 |
| Nash 10-11 | 49.2% | 52.5% | 39.5% | 91.2% | 54.2% | 60.1% | 15.6 | 3.9 | 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Nash 09-10 | 50.7% | 54.0% | 42.6% | 93.8% | 57.0% | 61.5% | 17.8 | 5.3 | 1.35 | 4.1 |
| Nash 08-09 | 50.3% | 52.9% | 43.9% | 93.3% | 56.6% | 61.5% | 16.4 | 4.8 | 1.36 | 4.1 |
| Nash 07-08 | 50.4% | 52.7% | 47.0% | 90.6% | 59.7% | 64.1% | 16.6 | 6.6 | 1.43 | 4.2 |
| Nash 06-07 | 53.2% | 57.5% | 45.5% | 89.9% | 61.3% | 65.4% | 17.4 | 6.1 | 1.45 | 4.4 |
| Nash 05-06 | 51.2% | 54.8% | 43.9% | 92.1% | 58.3% | 63.2% | 18.1 | 5.9 | 1.41 | 4.8 |
| Nash 04-05 | 50.2% | 52.6% | 43.1% | 88.7% | 55.7% | 60.6% | 16.0 | 4.1 | 1.36 | 4.4 |
| Nash 03-04 | 47.0% | 49.8% | 40.5% | 91.6% | 53.1% | 59.0% | 15.5 | 4.7 | 1.33 | 4.6 |
| Nash 02-03 | 46.5% | 48.2% | 41.3% | 90.9% | 51.5% | 57.6% | 19.7 | 4.8 | 1.31 | 6.0 |
| Nash 01-02 | 48.3% | 49.5% | 45.5% | 88.7% | 55.4% | 60.2% | 18.4 | 5.8 | 1.35 | 5.0 |
| Nash 00-01 | 48.7% | 51.8% | 40.6% | 89.5% | 54.4% | 60.3% | 15.9 | 4.4 | 1.38 | 5.2 |
| Nash (career) | 49.8% | 52.6% | 43.2% | 90.8% | 56.2% | 61.2% | 16.7 | 5.0 | 1.37 | 4.6 |
| Average PG | 43.0% | 45.9% | 35.6% | 80.6% | 48.0% | 52.7% | 16.1 | 4.5 | 1.18 | 4.4 |
| Team | GP | MIN | WP | PTS | REB | AST | BLK | STL | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-13 LAL | 50 | 1627 | 4.9 | 636 | 142 | 333 | 5 | 30 | 126 | 70 |
| 11-12 PHO | 62 | 1961 | 10.6 | 772 | 186 | 664 | 8 | 38 | 229 | 53 |
| 10-11 PHO | 75 | 2497 | 12.7 | 1106 | 260 | 855 | 5 | 48 | 265 | 87 |
| 09-10 PHO | 81 | 2660 | 13.8 | 1333 | 268 | 892 | 12 | 42 | 295 | 108 |
| 08-09 PHO | 74 | 2484 | 10.0 | 1160 | 223 | 717 | 10 | 55 | 248 | 108 |
| 07-08 PHO | 81 | 2780 | 14.6 | 1371 | 282 | 898 | 5 | 53 | 295 | 113 |
| 06-07 PHO | 76 | 2682 | 17.1 | 1412 | 269 | 884 | 6 | 57 | 287 | 117 |
| 05-06 PHO | 79 | 2796 | 17.1 | 1489 | 333 | 826 | 12 | 61 | 276 | 120 |
| 04-05 PHO | 75 | 2573 | 15.2 | 1165 | 249 | 861 | 6 | 74 | 245 | 136 |
| 03-04 DAL | 78 | 2612 | 11.7 | 1128 | 232 | 687 | 8 | 67 | 209 | 139 |
| 02-03 DAL | 82 | 2711 | 12.3 | 1455 | 234 | 598 | 6 | 85 | 192 | 134 |
| 01-02 DAL | 82 | 2838 | 11.3 | 1466 | 254 | 634 | 4 | 53 | 229 | 164 |
| 00-01 DAL | 70 | 2387 | 10.2 | 1092 | 223 | 509 | 5 | 72 | 205 | 158 |
| Career | 965 | 2508 | 12.4 | 15585 | 3155 | 9358 | 92 | 735 | 3101 | 1507 |
One of my biggest pet peeves is when people just spout "conventional" basketball wisdom without bothering to check the most basic facts. Conventional wisdom in just about every field of knowledge is usually riddled with falsehoods and logic traps, and basketball analysis is no exception. Today I am going to tackle one that's really been getting to me: the myth that a player's teammates' shooting percentage plays a large role in the number of assists a player racks up. Whether it's in defense of Kyrie Irving or Deron Williams, or in denegration of Ricky Rubio, I hear it all the time: "player X's assists are only so low because his teammates cannot shoot. If he played with better shooters, he'd have way more, I just know it."
The NBA Season is ready to start on Christmas Day, the last couple of preseason games are being played as I write this up, and it's time for me to cater to every serious NBA fans love of season previews! The 2011 Geektastic Preview is going to be way too large for one article, so I'm dividing it up into divisions (and even so, it's going to be long, so get a cup of coffee!). In this article I'm going to preview the Phoenix Suns.
