| SEA | POS | Min | WP48 | PoP48 | WP | PTS | DRB | ORB | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-10 ATL | SG | 2460 | .119 | 0.6 | 6.1 | 27.8 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 05-06 NYK | SG | 2555 | .117 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 21.2 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 4.7 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| 04-05 NYK | SG | 2688 | .079 | -0.6 | 4.4 | 22.2 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 01-02 CHI | PG | 481 | .070 | -0.9 | 0.7 | 21.4 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 07-08 NYK | SG | 3190 | .069 | -0.9 | 4.6 | 24.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 6.0 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 12-13 LAC | SG | 2230 | .065 | -1.0 | 3.0 | 27.0 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| 10-11 ATL | SG | 2295 | .061 | -1.2 | 2.9 | 22.5 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 03-04 CHI | SG | 2811 | .059 | -1.2 | 3.5 | 23.6 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.7 |
| 08-09 NYK | PG | 392 | .069 | -0.9 | 0.6 | 26.4 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 5.9 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| 08-09 GSW | PG | 2087 | .057 | -1.3 | 2.5 | 24.5 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| 02-03 CHI | PG | 1992 | .057 | -1.3 | 2.4 | 20.7 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 3.0 |
| 06-07 NYK | SG | 2198 | .049 | -1.6 | 2.2 | 22.7 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 |
| 11-12 POR | SG | 1613 | .021 | -2.4 | 0.7 | 24.9 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 00-01 CHI | PG | 1050 | -.034 | -4.1 | -0.7 | 12.9 | 3.7 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 3.1 |
| Career Avg | SG | 2157 | .067 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 23.4 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.4 |
| Average SG | SG | 1715 | .099 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 21.5 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 3.4 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | PPS | FTA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawford 09-10 | 44.9% | 49.1% | 38.2% | 85.7% | 52.3% | 57.3% | 21.6 | 8.3 | 1.29 | 6.1 |
| Crawford 05-06 | 41.6% | 45.2% | 34.5% | 82.6% | 47.4% | 54.4% | 16.5 | 5.5 | 1.28 | 6.7 |
| Crawford 04-05 | 39.8% | 43.1% | 36.1% | 84.3% | 48.3% | 52.1% | 19.6 | 9.1 | 1.13 | 3.9 |
| Crawford 01-02 | 47.6% | 48.8% | 44.8% | 76.9% | 54.5% | 55.5% | 18.7 | 5.8 | 1.14 | 1.3 |
| Crawford 07-08 | 41.0% | 43.9% | 35.6% | 86.4% | 47.3% | 52.8% | 20.9 | 7.4 | 1.18 | 5.7 |
| Crawford 12-13 | 43.8% | 47.7% | 37.6% | 87.1% | 51.1% | 55.8% | 21.9 | 8.5 | 1.24 | 5.3 |
| Crawford 10-11 | 42.1% | 47.4% | 34.1% | 85.4% | 48.9% | 54.5% | 18.3 | 7.3 | 1.23 | 5.4 |
| Crawford 03-04 | 38.6% | 43.2% | 31.7% | 83.3% | 44.9% | 48.6% | 22.5 | 8.9 | 1.05 | 4.1 |
| Crawford 08-09 | 41.0% | 44.1% | 36.0% | 87.2% | 47.9% | 54.5% | 19.8 | 7.6 | 1.25 | 6.7 |
| Crawford 02-03 | 41.3% | 43.8% | 35.5% | 80.6% | 46.7% | 49.6% | 19.5 | 5.8 | 1.06 | 3.1 |
| Crawford 06-07 | 40.0% | 44.5% | 32.0% | 83.8% | 45.8% | 51.7% | 19.3 | 7.0 | 1.17 | 5.9 |
| Crawford 11-12 | 38.4% | 42.6% | 30.8% | 92.7% | 43.8% | 50.6% | 21.9 | 7.7 | 1.14 | 6.1 |
| Crawford 00-01 | 35.2% | 35.3% | 35.0% | 79.4% | 41.9% | 44.2% | 13.9 | 5.3 | 0.93 | 1.6 |
| Crawford (career) | 41.1% | 44.8% | 35.0% | 85.4% | 47.7% | 52.8% | 19.9 | 7.5 | 1.18 | 5.2 |
| Average SG | 43.4% | 46.5% | 36.5% | 80.4% | 49.0% | 53.6% | 17.9 | 5.5 | 1.20 | 4.9 |
| Team | GP | MIN | WP | PTS | REB | AST | BLK | STL | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-10 ATL | 79 | 2460 | 6.1 | 1425 | 201 | 238 | 12 | 61 | 137 | 132 |
| 05-06 NYK | 79 | 2555 | 6.2 | 1128 | 248 | 301 | 15 | 87 | 175 | 150 |
| 04-05 NYK | 70 | 2688 | 4.4 | 1241 | 203 | 302 | 19 | 92 | 148 | 135 |
| 01-02 CHI | 23 | 481 | .7 | 214 | 34 | 55 | 5 | 18 | 32 | 18 |
| 07-08 NYK | 80 | 3190 | 4.6 | 1645 | 207 | 398 | 17 | 81 | 192 | 144 |
| 12-13 LAC | 76 | 2230 | 3.0 | 1255 | 128 | 193 | 13 | 79 | 146 | 71 |
| 10-11 ATL | 76 | 2295 | 2.9 | 1077 | 130 | 241 | 14 | 57 | 145 | 97 |
| 03-04 CHI | 80 | 2811 | 3.5 | 1383 | 283 | 405 | 29 | 111 | 193 | 161 |
| 08-09 NYK | 11 | 392 | .6 | 216 | 17 | 48 | 0 | 9 | 26 | 13 |
| 08-09 GSW | 54 | 2087 | 2.5 | 1064 | 176 | 240 | 13 | 48 | 122 | 79 |
| 02-03 CHI | 80 | 1992 | 2.4 | 858 | 185 | 334 | 25 | 77 | 134 | 126 |
| 06-07 NYK | 59 | 2198 | 2.2 | 1039 | 189 | 259 | 8 | 57 | 162 | 114 |
| 11-12 POR | 60 | 1613 | .7 | 837 | 118 | 191 | 14 | 55 | 111 | 74 |
| 00-01 CHI | 61 | 1050 | -.7 | 282 | 89 | 141 | 14 | 43 | 85 | 68 |
| Career | 888 | 2157 | 3.0 | 13664 | 2208 | 3346 | 198 | 875 | 1808 | 1382 |
The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.
Over at SheridanHoops, they have a run-down of the 2012 free agent class. It's mostly the stuff you'd expect -- Steve Nash is still really good, Deron Williams will make a lot of money, etc.
