| Season | POS | Min | WP48 | PoP48 | Wins | PTS | DRB | ORB | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
| Curry 09-10 | PG | 2896 | .115 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 23.2 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 7.8 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 4.2 |
| Curry 10-11 | PG | 2492 | .131 | 1.0 | 6.8 | 26.4 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 8.3 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Curry 11-12 | PG | 732 | .183 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 25.1 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 9.0 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 4.1 |
| Curry 12-13 | PG | 2983 | .184 | 2.6 | 11.4 | 28.7 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 5.1 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| Lawson 09-10 | PG | 1316 | .178 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 19.8 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 7.4 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 3.2 |
| Lawson 10-11 | PG | 2107 | .193 | 2.9 | 8.5 | 21.3 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 8.6 | 3.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| Lawson 11-12 | PG | 2124 | .182 | 2.6 | 8.1 | 22.6 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 9.1 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| Lawson 12-13 | PG | 2513 | .118 | 0.6 | 6.2 | 23.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 9.6 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| Average PG(2000 - 2013) | PG | 1692 | .099 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 19.0 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 4.8 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | PPS | FTA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curry 09-10 | 46.2% | 47.4% | 43.7% | 88.5% | 53.5% | 56.8% | 18.9 | 6.3 | 1.22 | 3.3 |
| Curry 10-11 | 48.0% | 49.8% | 44.2% | 93.4% | 55.1% | 59.5% | 20.3 | 6.6 | 1.30 | 4.4 |
| Curry 11-12 | 49.0% | 51.4% | 45.5% | 80.9% | 58.3% | 60.5% | 19.4 | 7.9 | 1.29 | 3.1 |
| Curry 12-13 | 45.1% | 44.9% | 45.3% | 90.0% | 54.9% | 58.9% | 22.3 | 9.7 | 1.29 | 4.7 |
| Lawson 09-10 | 51.5% | 54.4% | 41.0% | 75.7% | 55.9% | 60.0% | 14.2 | 3.0 | 1.39 | 5.1 |
| Lawson 10-11 | 50.3% | 53.6% | 40.4% | 76.4% | 55.3% | 59.3% | 15.7 | 3.9 | 1.36 | 5.1 |
| Lawson 11-12 | 48.8% | 53.1% | 36.5% | 82.4% | 53.5% | 57.9% | 17.3 | 4.5 | 1.30 | 4.9 |
| Lawson 12-13 | 46.1% | 49.1% | 36.6% | 75.6% | 50.5% | 54.9% | 18.5 | 4.4 | 1.25 | 5.9 |
| Average PG | 43.0% | 45.9% | 35.6% | 80.6% | 48.0% | 52.7% | 16.1 | 4.5 | 1.18 | 4.4 |
*only players with at least 300 minutes are used to calculate averages, and some averages might look odd until the sample sizes get big enough due to rounding effects.
