COMPARISON ENGINE


Shortcut! Compare All Rookies


  POS Min WP48 PoP48 Wins PTS DRB ORB REB AST TO BLK STL PF
Chandler C 2164 .294 6.1 13.3 15.3 9.6 6.0 15.6 1.4 1.9 1.7 0.9 4.2
Kidd PG 2043 .231 4.1 9.8 10.8 6.4 1.2 7.6 5.9 1.8 0.6 2.9 2.9
Novak SF 1641 .117 0.5 4.0 15.6 3.9 0.5 4.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.8 2.8
Stoudemire FC 682 .108 0.3 1.5 29.1 6.0 4.2 10.2 0.9 3.5 1.5 0.7 6.3
Shumpert SF 996 .102 0.1 2.1 14.7 5.1 1.5 6.6 3.6 1.8 0.3 2.1 4.8
Lin PG 2640 .091 -0.3 5.0 19.9 3.9 0.6 4.5 9.0 4.3 0.5 2.4 3.7
Felton PG 2313 .073 -0.8 3.5 19.7 3.0 1.1 4.0 7.7 3.2 0.3 2.0 2.7
Anthony PF 2482 .044 -1.7 2.3 37.1 6.3 2.6 8.9 3.3 3.4 0.6 1.0 4.0
Camby FC 250 .030 -2.2 0.2 8.1 10.8 4.6 15.4 2.7 2.9 2.7 1.3 5.4
Average C C 1336 .099 0.0 2.8 18.3 8.9 4.3 13.2 2.3 2.7 2.2 1.2 5.0
Average PF PF 1645 .099 0.0 3.4 20.6 8.2 3.5 11.7 3.0 2.6 1.4 1.4 4.3
Average PG PG 1651 .099 0.0 3.4 20.2 3.9 0.9 4.8 8.6 3.5 0.4 1.9 3.4
Average SF SF 1602 .099 0.0 3.3 18.4 6.1 1.7 7.8 3.3 2.3 0.8 1.6 3.5
Average FC FC 958 .099 0.0 2.0 18.3 7.9 4.1 12.0 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.5 5.1
  FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA PPS FTA
Chandler 63.7% 63.7% 0.0% 69.4% 63.7% 67.1% 8.9 0.0 1.72 5.7
Kidd 37.2% 45.2% 35.1% 83.3% 51.1% 53.2% 9.6 7.6 1.12 1.1
Novak 41.4% 36.7% 42.5% 90.9% 58.7% 60.2% 12.6 10.3 1.24 1.0
Stoudemire 57.7% 57.7% 0.0% 80.8% 57.7% 63.7% 18.8 0.0 1.55 9.1
Shumpert 39.6% 39.2% 40.2% 76.6% 48.9% 51.6% 13.3 6.1 1.11 2.3
Lin 44.1% 48.3% 33.9% 78.5% 49.0% 53.8% 16.3 4.7 1.22 5.0
Felton 42.7% 45.5% 36.0% 78.9% 48.0% 50.5% 18.3 5.4 1.07 2.7
Anthony 44.9% 47.6% 37.9% 83.0% 50.2% 56.0% 28.8 8.0 1.29 9.9
Camby 32.1% 32.1% 0.0% 42.1% 32.1% 34.2% 10.2 0.0 0.79 3.6
Average C 50.6% 51.1% 28.5% 67.9% 50.9% 54.2% 14.8 0.4 1.24 4.8
Average PF 48.2% 50.0% 34.3% 71.1% 50.2% 53.7% 17.0 2.0 1.21 5.0
Average PG 43.2% 46.3% 36.6% 81.5% 49.1% 53.3% 17.1 5.4 1.18 4.2
Average SF 43.6% 47.3% 36.6% 77.9% 49.9% 53.7% 15.5 5.3 1.19 3.8
Average FC 48.0% 49.2% 26.8% 72.6% 48.7% 52.8% 15.2 0.8 1.20 4.8

*only players with at least 300 minutes are used to calculate averages, and some averages might look odd until the sample sizes get big enough due to rounding effects.