| NAME | POS | GP | MIN | WP48 | PoP48 | WINS | PTS | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taj Gibson | FC | 65 | 1459 | .072 | -0.8 | 2.18 | 17.0 | 11.4 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 5.5 |
| Joakim Noah | FC | 66 | 2426 | .225 | 3.9 | 11.37 | 15.5 | 14.5 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 3.7 |
| Nazr Mohammed | C | 63 | 693 | .050 | -1.5 | 0.72 | 11.5 | 13.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 6.7 |
| Vladimir Radmanovic | F | 25 | 144 | -.053 | -4.7 | -0.16 | 11.0 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 9.7 |
| Malcolm Thomas | PF | 7 | 36 | .237 | 4.3 | 0.18 | 16.0 | 14.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 9.3 |
| Daequan Cook | GF | 33 | 276 | -.143 | -7.5 | -0.82 | 14.3 | 7.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.3 |
| Marquis Teague | PG | 48 | 392 | -.086 | -5.8 | -0.70 | 12.1 | 5.4 | 7.7 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 5.8 |
| Jimmy Butler | SF | 82 | 2134 | .243 | 4.5 | 10.80 | 15.9 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| Kirk Hinrich | PG | 60 | 1764 | .086 | -0.4 | 3.15 | 12.5 | 4.3 | 8.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 5.2 |
| Luol Deng | SF | 75 | 2903 | .126 | 0.8 | 7.62 | 20.5 | 7.9 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| Carlos Boozer | PF | 79 | 2546 | .067 | -1.0 | 3.56 | 24.2 | 14.5 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4.5 |
| Nate Robinson | PG | 82 | 2086 | .085 | -0.4 | 3.68 | 24.7 | 4.2 | 8.2 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 4.8 |
| Richard Hamilton | SG | 50 | 1088 | -.067 | -5.2 | -1.52 | 21.6 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 4.1 |
| Marco Belinelli | SG | 73 | 1882 | .035 | -2.0 | 1.37 | 17.9 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3.6 |
| Derrick Rose | PG | 0 | 0 | .000 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Louis Amundson | PF | 1 | 2 | -.145 | -7.6 | -0.01 | 0.0 | 24.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Name | FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | FTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taj Gibson | 48.5% | 49.0% | 0.0% | 67.9% | 48.5% | 51.8% | 14.5 | 0.1 | 4.3 |
| Joakim Noah | 48.1% | 48.5% | 0.0% | 75.1% | 48.1% | 53.4% | 12.5 | 0.1 | 4.7 |
| Nazr Mohammed | 36.7% | 37.1% | 0.0% | 72.3% | 36.7% | 41.4% | 12.5 | 0.1 | 3.3 |
| Vladimir Radmanovic | 30.2% | 50.0% | 18.5% | 66.7% | 36.0% | 37.2% | 14.3 | 9.0 | 1.0 |
| Malcolm Thomas | 55.6% | 55.6% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 55.8% | 12.0 | 0.0 | 5.3 |
| Daequan Cook | 27.8% | 31.9% | 24.6% | 77.8% | 34.7% | 36.6% | 18.8 | 10.6 | 1.6 |
| Marquis Teague | 38.1% | 43.3% | 17.4% | 56.2% | 39.8% | 41.2% | 13.8 | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| Jimmy Butler | 46.7% | 48.9% | 38.1% | 80.3% | 50.6% | 57.4% | 11.5 | 2.4 | 5.2 |
| Kirk Hinrich | 37.7% | 36.7% | 39.0% | 71.4% | 46.1% | 49.3% | 11.5 | 5.0 | 2.7 |
| Luol Deng | 42.6% | 45.5% | 32.2% | 81.6% | 46.1% | 50.8% | 18.1 | 3.9 | 4.7 |
| Carlos Boozer | 47.7% | 47.8% | 0.0% | 73.1% | 47.7% | 51.0% | 21.5 | 0.0 | 5.0 |
| Nate Robinson | 43.3% | 45.0% | 40.5% | 79.9% | 51.0% | 54.0% | 21.2 | 8.0 | 3.9 |
| Richard Hamilton | 42.9% | 44.4% | 30.8% | 85.7% | 44.6% | 48.1% | 21.0 | 2.3 | 3.4 |
| Marco Belinelli | 39.5% | 41.6% | 35.7% | 83.9% | 46.0% | 51.3% | 15.6 | 5.6 | 4.3 |
| Derrick Rose | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Louis Amundson | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 24.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| WP48 | WINS | PTS | DRB | ORB | TRB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 0.561 | 41.4 | 93.2 | 30.7 | 12.5 | 43.2 | 23.0 | 14.3 | 5.1 | 7.2 | 19.7 |
| AVG | 0.500 | 41.0 | 98.1 | 31.0 | 11.2 | 42.1 | 22.1 | 14.6 | 5.1 | 7.8 | 19.8 |
| OPP | 0.439 | 40.6 | 92.9 | 30.1 | 11.0 | 41.1 | 18.8 | 13.7 | 5.8 | 7.3 | 19.6 |
| AVGOPP | 0.500 | 41.0 | 98.1 | 31.0 | 11.2 | 42.1 | 22.1 | 14.6 | 5.1 | 7.8 | 19.8 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | FTA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 43.7% | 45.6% | 35.3% | 77.3% | 47.0% | 51.2% | 81.7 | 15.4 | 21.2 | ||
| AVG | 45.3% | 48.3% | 35.9% | 75.3% | 49.6% | 53.5% | 82.0 | 20.0 | 22.2 | ||
| Expected* | Actual | Forecast** |
|---|---|---|
| 41.4-40.6 | 45-37 | n/a |
* The win-loss record that wins produced would have predicted based on players' WP48 so far (ignores previous seasons).
** future games only -- takes current record as given
Hey folks! As you know, real life is making it hard for me to update articles lately. Luckily, my friend Andres Alvarez (@nerdnumbers) has agreed to step up and help fill the void. Today, Dre takes on one of our favorite arguments: RINGZ.
The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.
I'm calling them guesses, not predictions, because this way if I'm completely wrong, I won't look as stupid.