| NAME | POS | GP | MIN | WP48 | PoP48 | WINS | PTS | REB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omer Asik | C | 66 | 971 | .225 | 3.9 | 4.55 | 10.1 | 17.3 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 6.0 |
| Carlos Boozer | PF | 66 | 1948 | .151 | 1.6 | 6.13 | 24.4 | 13.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 4.1 |
| Ronnie Brewer | SG | 66 | 1635 | .180 | 2.5 | 6.12 | 13.4 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Jimmy Butler | F | 42 | 359 | .136 | 1.2 | 1.02 | 14.6 | 7.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Luol Deng | SF | 54 | 2129 | .123 | 0.8 | 5.46 | 18.7 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| Taj Gibson | PF | 63 | 1284 | .176 | 2.4 | 4.70 | 18.1 | 12.4 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 4.9 |
| Richard Hamilton | SG | 28 | 697 | .008 | -2.8 | 0.12 | 22.5 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.9 |
| Mike James | PG | 11 | 120 | -.030 | -4.0 | -0.08 | 21.2 | 4.0 | 11.6 | 5.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 8.0 |
| Kyle Korver | SF | 65 | 1469 | .163 | 2.0 | 5.00 | 17.3 | 5.2 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 3.6 |
| John Lucas | PG | 49 | 726 | .039 | -1.9 | 0.59 | 24.4 | 5.0 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.8 |
| Joakim Noah | C | 64 | 1945 | .281 | 5.7 | 11.40 | 16.1 | 15.5 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 4.0 |
| Derrick Rose | PG | 39 | 1375 | .135 | 1.1 | 3.87 | 29.7 | 4.6 | 10.7 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Brian Scalabrine | PF | 28 | 122 | .122 | 0.7 | 0.31 | 12.6 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 3.5 |
| C.J. Watson | PG | 49 | 1159 | .027 | -2.2 | 0.64 | 19.6 | 4.3 | 8.3 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.3 |
| Name | FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | FTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omer Asik | 50.6% | 50.6% | 0.0% | 45.6% | 50.6% | 50.9% | 7.7 | 0.0 | 5.1 |
| Carlos Boozer | 53.2% | 53.3% | 0.0% | 69.3% | 53.2% | 54.9% | 20.7 | 0.0 | 3.4 |
| Ronnie Brewer | 42.7% | 45.5% | 27.5% | 56.0% | 44.8% | 46.5% | 13.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| Jimmy Butler | 40.5% | 44.1% | 18.2% | 76.8% | 41.8% | 52.6% | 10.6 | 1.5 | 7.5 |
| Luol Deng | 41.2% | 43.0% | 36.7% | 77.0% | 46.4% | 50.0% | 17.0 | 4.8 | 3.7 |
| Taj Gibson | 49.5% | 49.5% | 0.0% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.2% | 15.1 | 0.0 | 5.0 |
| Richard Hamilton | 45.2% | 46.6% | 37.0% | 78.4% | 47.9% | 50.0% | 21.3 | 3.2 | 2.5 |
| Mike James | 40.8% | 35.9% | 60.0% | 87.5% | 46.9% | 50.5% | 19.6 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Kyle Korver | 43.2% | 42.6% | 43.5% | 83.3% | 57.5% | 60.0% | 13.5 | 8.9 | 2.2 |
| John Lucas | 39.9% | 40.4% | 39.3% | 87.5% | 47.6% | 49.6% | 23.7 | 9.3 | 2.1 |
| Joakim Noah | 50.8% | 50.9% | 0.0% | 74.8% | 50.8% | 56.1% | 12.1 | 0.0 | 5.1 |
| Derrick Rose | 43.5% | 47.5% | 31.2% | 81.2% | 47.3% | 53.2% | 24.3 | 6.0 | 8.3 |
| Brian Scalabrine | 46.7% | 56.5% | 14.3% | 50.0% | 48.3% | 49.0% | 11.8 | 2.8 | 2.4 |
| C.J. Watson | 36.8% | 35.2% | 39.3% | 80.8% | 44.6% | 49.1% | 18.1 | 7.2 | 4.3 |
| WP48 | WINS | PTS | DRB | ORB | TRB | AST | TO | BLK | STL | PF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 0.586 | 49.9 | 96.3 | 32.8 | 13.9 | 46.7 | 23.1 | 14.0 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 17.3 |
| AVG | 0.500 | 33.0 | 96.3 | 30.8 | 11.4 | 42.2 | 21.0 | 14.6 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 19.6 |
| OPP | 0.414 | 16.1 | 88.2 | 28.6 | 11.4 | 40.0 | 18.9 | 13.3 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 17.7 |
| AVGOPP | 0.500 | 33.0 | 96.3 | 30.8 | 11.4 | 42.2 | 21.0 | 14.6 | 5.1 | 7.7 | 19.6 |
| FG% | 2FG% | 3FG% | FT% | eFG% | TS% | FGA | 3FGA | FTA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 45.2% | 47.1% | 37.5% | 72.2% | 49.0% | 52.3% | 82.8 | 16.9 | 21.1 | ||
| AVG | 44.8% | 47.7% | 34.9% | 75.2% | 48.7% | 52.7% | 81.4 | 18.4 | 22.5 | ||
| Expected* | Actual | Forecast** |
|---|---|---|
| 49.9-16.1 | 50-16 | n/a |
* The win-loss record that wins produced would have predicted based on players' WP48 so far (ignores previous seasons).
** future games only -- takes current record as given
Hey folks! As you know, real life is making it hard for me to update articles lately. Luckily, my friend Andres Alvarez (@nerdnumbers) has agreed to step up and help fill the void. Today, Dre takes on one of our favorite arguments: RINGZ.
The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.
I'm calling them guesses, not predictions, because this way if I'm completely wrong, I won't look as stupid.
