NAME POS GP MIN WP48 PoP48 WINS PTS REB AST TO BLK STL PF
Shandon Anderson SF 82 1596 .054 -1.4 1.79 12.4 7.5 2.3 2.9 0.5 1.4 4.0
Marcus Camby C 29 1007 .136 1.2 2.85 15.3 15.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 1.6 5.1
Howard Eisley PG 39 609 -.042 -4.4 -0.54 13.5 3.9 7.9 4.2 0.2 1.9 4.3
Othella Harrington PF 77 1564 .058 -1.3 1.88 18.3 10.7 1.1 2.9 1.1 0.9 7.7
Allan Houston SG 77 2914 .039 -1.9 2.36 25.8 4.2 3.1 2.8 0.2 0.9 3.0
Mark Jackson PG 82 2367 .227 4.0 11.21 13.9 6.3 12.3 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.3
Travis Knight C 49 429 -.128 -7.1 -1.15 11.0 11.6 0.9 3.0 1.1 1.2 10.6
Lavor Postell SG 23 179 -.111 -6.5 -0.41 24.9 4.3 1.3 2.9 0.0 1.6 1.9
Larry Robinson SG 2 10 -.103 -6.3 -0.02 14.4 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8
Felton Spencer C 32 248 -.168 -8.3 -0.87 5.6 9.7 0.6 2.3 1.5 1.4 14.1
Latrell Sprewell SF 81 3326 .003 -3.0 0.18 22.7 4.3 4.5 3.2 0.2 1.4 2.3
Kurt Thomas C 82 2771 .065 -1.0 3.77 19.8 12.9 1.5 2.7 1.4 1.2 5.9
Charlie Ward PG 63 1058 .145 1.4 3.19 14.8 5.8 9.2 3.4 0.6 3.1 4.5
Clarence Weatherspoon PF 56 1727 .142 1.3 5.10 13.7 12.8 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.0 3.7
Name FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
Shandon Anderson 39.9% 47.4% 27.7% 69.2% 45.2% 48.9% 11.2 4.2 3.2
Marcus Camby 44.8% 45.0% 0.0% 62.6% 44.8% 48.3% 13.8 0.0 4.7
Howard Eisley 33.7% 38.5% 24.1% 79.6% 37.7% 43.5% 13.8 4.6 3.9
Othella Harrington 52.7% 52.9% 0.0% 70.9% 52.7% 56.7% 13.8 0.1 5.3
Allan Houston 43.7% 45.2% 39.3% 87.0% 48.9% 54.0% 21.4 5.7 5.6
Mark Jackson 43.9% 45.6% 40.5% 79.1% 50.6% 53.6% 12.0 4.0 2.2
Travis Knight 36.3% 36.3% 0.0% 76.2% 36.3% 40.1% 12.6 0.0 2.3
Lavor Postell 33.3% 37.9% 23.1% 75.6% 36.9% 45.6% 22.5 7.0 11.0
Larry Robinson 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 19.2 9.6 0.0
Felton Spencer 23.1% 23.1% 0.0% 51.5% 23.1% 35.8% 5.0 0.0 6.4
Latrell Sprewell 40.4% 42.1% 36.0% 82.1% 45.5% 50.1% 20.5 5.8 5.0
Kurt Thomas 49.4% 49.6% 16.7% 81.5% 49.4% 54.2% 16.2 0.1 4.6
Charlie Ward 37.3% 43.2% 32.3% 81.0% 46.0% 49.6% 13.7 7.4 2.6
Clarence Weatherspoon 41.8% 41.8% 0.0% 79.5% 41.8% 47.8% 12.6 0.0 4.1
  WP48 WINS PTS DRB ORB TRB AST TO BLK STL PF
NYK 0.096 29.4 91.6 30.0 10.7 40.7 21.0 14.5 3.5 6.8 22.0
AVG 0.500 41.0 95.5 30.2 12.2 42.4 21.9 14.5 5.2 7.8 21.2
OPP 0.904 52.6 95.6 31.0 11.7 42.7 21.5 13.5 4.7 8.4 20.4
AVGOPP 0.500 41.0 95.5 30.2 12.2 42.4 21.9 14.5 5.2 7.8 21.2
  FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
NYK 43.2% 45.3% 35.3% 78.7% 46.8% 51.4% 79.5 16.4 21.8
AVG 44.5% 46.5% 35.4% 75.2% 47.7% 52.0% 81.3 14.7 23.8

Wins Produced
Expected* Actual Forecast**
29.4-52.6 30-52 n/a

* The win-loss record that wins produced would have predicted based on players' WP48 so far (ignores previous seasons).

** future games only -- takes current record as given


Articles featuring the New York Knicks

The 10 Best 2012-13 Contracts

The other day I did the ten worst contracts of the season. It was a fairly big hit, and as usual, not everyone agreed with my picks. I expect more of the same today, as I pick the ten best.

The 10 Worst 2012-13 Contracts

The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.

Framing Linsanity

Regulars readers of my blog, and the Wages of Wins, will know that I am a big proponent of data-driven analysis because the human mind is known to fall victim to lots of cognitive biases. Worse, the awareness of cognitive bias does not protect a person from falling victim to them. Two very common bias that I see running rampant the last couple of days are framing and anchoring. Framing is extremely common in political rhetoric precisely because it is extremely effective. And I use them all the time in my rhetoric. I can tell you this with no trepidation because I know that even though I am telling you this, the next time you read something that makes sense to you, the knowledge that I might just be abusing a cognitive bias will not protect you.

The NBA Geek's Amnesty Guesses, Part 2

As with part 1 (which you can read here), I'm calling them guesses, not predictions, because this way if I'm completely wrong, I won't look as stupid.  Will I do something as crazy as amnestying Kobe freaking Bryant again today?