NAME POS GP MIN WP48 PoP48 WINS PTS REB AST TO BLK STL PF
Renaldo Balkman SF 68 1064 .264 5.1 5.86 15.1 13.3 2.0 2.2 2.0 2.6 6.6
Kelvin Cato C 18 95 .106 0.2 0.21 11.1 15.7 0.0 3.0 5.1 1.5 5.1
Mardy Collins SG 52 777 .020 -2.5 0.32 14.5 6.4 5.1 3.5 0.2 2.0 4.6
Jamal Crawford SG 59 2198 .049 -1.6 2.23 22.7 4.1 5.7 3.5 0.2 1.2 2.5
Eddy Curry C 81 2849 -.004 -3.2 -0.21 26.6 9.6 1.1 5.0 0.7 0.6 4.5
Steve Francis SG 44 1237 .145 1.4 3.73 19.3 6.1 6.6 3.9 0.5 1.6 4.9
Channing Frye PF 72 1896 -.064 -5.1 -2.53 17.3 10.0 1.7 2.5 1.1 0.9 5.5
Jerome James C 41 273 -.190 -9.0 -1.08 13.4 11.6 0.5 4.0 2.6 1.1 12.8
Jared Jeffries SF 55 1307 .141 1.3 3.85 8.2 8.7 2.5 2.2 1.1 1.6 5.5
David Lee PF 58 1731 .338 7.4 12.20 17.2 16.7 2.9 2.6 0.6 1.3 4.3
Stephon Marbury PG 74 2748 .071 -0.9 4.08 21.1 3.7 7.0 3.1 0.2 1.2 3.2
Randolph Morris PF 5 44 -.094 -6.0 -0.09 4.4 9.8 1.1 2.2 1.1 2.2 4.4
Quentin Richardson SF 49 1621 .142 1.3 4.80 18.8 10.4 3.2 2.1 0.2 1.1 3.9
Nate Robinson PG 64 1356 .065 -1.1 1.84 22.8 5.4 3.2 2.5 0.2 1.8 5.7
Malik Rose PF 65 810 -.030 -4.0 -0.50 11.4 10.4 3.9 3.9 0.5 1.5 7.1
Name FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
Renaldo Balkman 50.5% 54.0% 18.5% 56.7% 51.5% 53.1% 12.4 1.2 4.1
Kelvin Cato 31.8% 31.8% 0.0% 66.7% 31.8% 40.3% 11.1 0.0 6.1
Mardy Collins 38.2% 40.9% 27.7% 58.5% 41.0% 44.5% 14.1 2.9 5.1
Jamal Crawford 40.0% 44.5% 32.0% 83.8% 45.8% 51.7% 19.3 7.0 5.9
Eddy Curry 57.6% 57.5% 100.0% 61.5% 57.6% 60.3% 17.1 0.0 11.1
Steve Francis 40.8% 42.2% 37.8% 82.9% 46.9% 57.0% 13.3 4.3 8.2
Channing Frye 43.3% 44.0% 16.7% 78.7% 43.5% 46.4% 17.4 0.5 2.7
Jerome James 41.8% 41.8% 0.0% 55.6% 41.8% 43.7% 13.9 0.0 3.2
Jared Jeffries 46.1% 50.0% 10.0% 45.6% 46.6% 47.3% 7.6 0.7 2.5
David Lee 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 81.5% 60.0% 65.2% 11.1 0.0 4.8
Stephon Marbury 41.5% 44.8% 35.7% 76.9% 48.0% 53.9% 16.6 6.0 6.7
Randolph Morris 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% 16.7% 23.1% 6.5 0.0 6.5
Quentin Richardson 41.8% 45.6% 37.6% 69.2% 50.7% 53.2% 16.1 7.6 3.6
Nate Robinson 43.4% 46.5% 39.0% 77.7% 51.3% 55.2% 18.5 7.5 4.9
Malik Rose 39.8% 40.4% 25.0% 80.8% 40.3% 46.0% 11.0 0.5 3.1
  WP48 WINS PTS DRB ORB TRB AST TO BLK STL PF
NYK 0.162 34.7 97.5 30.7 12.6 43.3 18.7 17.1 3.2 6.6 23.6
AVG 0.500 41.0 98.7 29.9 11.1 41.1 21.3 15.1 4.6 7.2 22.2
OPP 0.838 47.3 100.3 28.0 10.8 38.8 21.3 13.7 5.0 7.5 22.9
AVGOPP 0.500 41.0 98.7 29.9 11.1 41.1 21.3 15.1 4.6 7.2 22.2
  FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
NYK 45.7% 48.7% 34.6% 71.5% 49.4% 53.9% 77.5 16.7 29.2
AVG 45.8% 48.5% 35.8% 75.2% 49.6% 54.1% 79.7 16.9 26.1

Wins Produced
Expected* Actual Forecast**
34.7-47.3 33-49 n/a

* The win-loss record that wins produced would have predicted based on players' WP48 so far (ignores previous seasons).

** future games only -- takes current record as given


Articles featuring the New York Knicks

The 10 Best 2012-13 Contracts

The other day I did the ten worst contracts of the season. It was a fairly big hit, and as usual, not everyone agreed with my picks. I expect more of the same today, as I pick the ten best.

The 10 Worst 2012-13 Contracts

The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.

Framing Linsanity

Regulars readers of my blog, and the Wages of Wins, will know that I am a big proponent of data-driven analysis because the human mind is known to fall victim to lots of cognitive biases. Worse, the awareness of cognitive bias does not protect a person from falling victim to them. Two very common bias that I see running rampant the last couple of days are framing and anchoring. Framing is extremely common in political rhetoric precisely because it is extremely effective. And I use them all the time in my rhetoric. I can tell you this with no trepidation because I know that even though I am telling you this, the next time you read something that makes sense to you, the knowledge that I might just be abusing a cognitive bias will not protect you.

The NBA Geek's Amnesty Guesses, Part 2

As with part 1 (which you can read here), I'm calling them guesses, not predictions, because this way if I'm completely wrong, I won't look as stupid.  Will I do something as crazy as amnestying Kobe freaking Bryant again today?