NAME POS GP MIN WP48 PoP48 WINS PTS REB AST TO BLK STL PF
Renaldo Balkman SF 65 952 .178 2.5 3.53 11.3 10.9 2.0 1.9 1.5 2.2 6.7
Wilson Chandler SF 35 685 .037 -1.9 0.53 17.9 8.9 2.3 1.9 1.1 1.1 5.8
Mardy Collins SG 46 634 -.066 -5.1 -0.87 11.0 5.7 6.7 4.2 0.6 1.8 4.2
Jamal Crawford SG 80 3190 .069 -0.9 4.60 24.8 3.1 6.0 2.9 0.3 1.2 2.2
Eddy Curry C 59 1530 -.040 -4.3 -1.27 24.5 8.6 1.0 4.0 0.9 0.4 4.9
Jerome James C 2 5 .978 27.3 0.10 38.4 28.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Jared Jeffries PF 73 1325 .008 -2.8 0.23 9.7 8.8 2.4 2.3 0.8 1.3 4.8
Fred Jones SG 70 1757 .082 -0.5 3.01 14.5 4.6 4.5 2.1 0.5 1.3 3.8
David Lee PF 81 2356 .204 3.3 9.99 17.8 14.8 1.9 2.0 0.6 1.1 4.3
Stephon Marbury PG 24 805 .057 -1.3 0.96 19.9 3.5 6.7 2.9 0.1 1.3 3.4
Randolph Morris C 18 181 -.264 -11.3 -1.00 14.9 9.8 0.5 2.4 0.5 1.1 9.8
Zach Randolph C 69 2244 .056 -1.3 2.62 26.0 15.2 3.0 4.0 0.3 1.3 4.1
Quentin Richardson SF 65 1841 .043 -1.7 1.64 13.7 8.2 3.0 1.8 0.4 1.1 4.0
Nate Robinson PG 72 1883 .044 -1.7 1.72 23.3 5.7 5.4 2.6 0.0 1.5 4.7
Malik Rose PF 49 494 -.134 -7.3 -1.38 16.6 10.0 2.7 3.9 0.7 1.6 7.8
Name FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
Renaldo Balkman 48.9% 51.7% 8.3% 43.2% 49.2% 49.2% 9.4 0.6 4.8
Wilson Chandler 43.8% 45.8% 30.0% 63.0% 45.7% 48.0% 17.0 2.1 3.8
Mardy Collins 32.6% 34.3% 25.0% 60.5% 34.9% 37.8% 13.2 2.4 2.9
Jamal Crawford 41.0% 43.9% 35.6% 86.4% 47.3% 52.8% 20.9 7.4 5.7
Eddy Curry 54.6% 54.6% 0.0% 62.3% 54.6% 57.8% 17.1 0.0 9.4
Jerome James 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 106.4% 9.6 0.0 19.2
Jared Jeffries 40.0% 42.4% 16.0% 52.7% 40.7% 43.3% 9.8 0.9 3.4
Fred Jones 42.1% 45.0% 38.5% 74.6% 50.7% 54.6% 11.8 5.2 3.4
David Lee 55.2% 55.4% 0.0% 81.9% 55.2% 60.6% 12.6 0.0 4.8
Stephon Marbury 41.9% 43.5% 37.8% 71.6% 47.2% 52.7% 15.8 4.4 6.9
Randolph Morris 36.2% 36.2% 0.0% 48.3% 36.2% 39.6% 15.4 0.0 7.7
Zach Randolph 45.9% 47.4% 27.5% 77.2% 47.0% 51.3% 22.6 1.7 6.2
Quentin Richardson 35.9% 38.1% 32.2% 68.2% 42.1% 44.4% 14.5 5.6 2.3
Nate Robinson 42.3% 47.8% 33.2% 78.6% 48.5% 52.6% 19.9 7.4 5.0
Malik Rose 36.7% 37.0% 28.6% 72.5% 37.2% 42.2% 17.5 0.7 5.0
  WP48 WINS PTS DRB ORB TRB AST TO BLK STL PF
NYK 0.102 24.4 96.9 30.0 12.5 42.5 18.7 14.5 2.6 6.4 21.5
AVG 0.500 41.0 99.9 30.8 11.2 42.0 21.8 14.1 4.7 7.3 21.0
OPP 0.898 57.6 103.5 31.4 11.3 42.6 21.6 12.8 5.2 7.6 20.3
AVGOPP 0.500 41.0 99.9 30.8 11.2 42.0 21.8 14.1 4.7 7.3 21.0
  FG% 2FG% 3FG% FT% eFG% TS% FGA 3FGA FTA
NYK 43.9% 46.7% 33.7% 72.7% 47.5% 51.8% 82.4 17.7 25.5
AVG 45.7% 48.4% 36.2% 75.5% 49.7% 54.0% 81.5 18.1 24.9

Wins Produced
Expected* Actual Forecast**
24.4-57.6 23-59 n/a

* The win-loss record that wins produced would have predicted based on players' WP48 so far (ignores previous seasons).

** future games only -- takes current record as given


Articles featuring the New York Knicks

The 10 Best 2012-13 Contracts

The other day I did the ten worst contracts of the season. It was a fairly big hit, and as usual, not everyone agreed with my picks. I expect more of the same today, as I pick the ten best.

The 10 Worst 2012-13 Contracts

The dust has (almost) settled on the 2012 offseason. I think it's time for us to look at the best and worst contracts of this season. It seems like every year, several teams are looking to unload "bad" contracts. We often forget that teams weren't just magically saddled with those bad contracts; somebody volunteered to pay them.

Framing Linsanity

Regulars readers of my blog, and the Wages of Wins, will know that I am a big proponent of data-driven analysis because the human mind is known to fall victim to lots of cognitive biases. Worse, the awareness of cognitive bias does not protect a person from falling victim to them. Two very common bias that I see running rampant the last couple of days are framing and anchoring. Framing is extremely common in political rhetoric precisely because it is extremely effective. And I use them all the time in my rhetoric. I can tell you this with no trepidation because I know that even though I am telling you this, the next time you read something that makes sense to you, the knowledge that I might just be abusing a cognitive bias will not protect you.

The NBA Geek's Amnesty Guesses, Part 2

As with part 1 (which you can read here), I'm calling them guesses, not predictions, because this way if I'm completely wrong, I won't look as stupid.  Will I do something as crazy as amnestying Kobe freaking Bryant again today?